skip to primary navigation skip to content
 

 

Genealogies « Top of the Campops: 60 things you didn't know about family, marriage, work, and death since the middle ages

Top of the Campops: 60 things you didn't know about family, marriage, work, and death since the middle ages

Posts Tagged ‘Genealogies’

Chinese genealogies are different

Thursday, September 5th, 2024

Ying Dai

People’s keen interest in exploring their family trees, as evidenced by the popularity of websites like Ancestry.com, is not just a modern Western phenomenon but also has deep historical roots in China. Unlike Western genealogies that track lineage through both paternal and maternal lines starting from the individual upwards (see “What a big family you have, Grandma!), Chinese genealogies typically begin with a common ancestor and document all descendants downwards. This key difference reflects the distinct roles of genealogies in each culture. In the West, genealogical research is often driven by personal curiosity, whereas in China, it has significant socioeconomic functions, deeply intertwined with the transformation of the country. 

Illustration of western and Chinese genealogies. Drawn by author.

From imperial roots to modern revival 

Chinese genealogical records, originally reserved for royal and noble families, gained broader societal importance during the Ming (1368–1644) and Qing (1636–1912) dynasties. During this era, lineages were crucial for collaboration in business and the organisation of villages. The lineages owned collective properties, established business networks, and supported education and poor relief. The practice of documenting lineage membership based on common descent was crucial here, leading to widespread compilation and updates of genealogies across wider society. 

A Chinese family sit around a small cooking stove eating by the side of the road. Coloured lithograph after W. Alexander. Wellcome Collection.

In the first seven decades of the 20th century, these genealogies were criticized as part of a patriarchal ‘old culture’ that was believed to have resulted in China’s ‘backwardness’. Between the 1950s and the 1970s, with the dominance of class and collectivism in social organisation, the lineage lost many of its traditional socio-economic roles. As a result, the practice of compiling and maintaining genealogies significantly diminished. 

In the 1980s, China saw a revival in the practice of compiling genealogies. The reintroduction of market institutions reemphasized the importance of blood and marital ties, both within the country and between domestic and overseas Chinese. Economic progress enabled more families to afford the compilation, maintenance, or updating of their genealogical records. This revival reflects a renewed appreciation for China’s traditional values. 

Both photos depict contemporary genealogies. The photo on the left features genealogies bound in traditional covers, whereas the one on the right displays genealogies in modern book formats. Photographed by the author at Zhejiang Library.

Tradition partially transformed 

The revival of genealogy compilation is not a return to tradition. Two main trends characterize this new generation of Chinese genealogies:

  1. Occupational information is documented more comprehensively. Traditionally, only notable individuals had their occupations recorded, but now, some of the new genealogies captured the occupational information of ordinary workers like peasants, petty businessmen, and factory workers. The comprehensive recording of occupations in the new genealogies sometimes serves merely to keep a fuller record of lineage members. However, it often reflects a deliberate intent to change traditional practices that highlighted only distinguished individuals. A notable example is the genealogy of the Yang Lineage in Jiangsu, in which “lineage members are all equally included with their biographies so as to change the old norm of making biographies for the [distinct] minority. 
  2. Womens information is recorded much more comprehensively. Traditional genealogies typically traced only male descendants, answering the question Who is my father’s father’s father’s … father? However, a small proportion of the new genealogies now track female descendants and their offspring for one to three generations, allowing some individuals to know Who is my mother’s … mother? Furthermore, female lineage members were now given individual entries, instead of being listed under their fathers or husbands’ names, and the contents of women’s entries also begun to align with those of mens. 

Registration form of the Qian Lineage for genealogy compilation. Provided by Xiaoqin Qian.

The new trends reflect modern values of occupational and gender equality. However, the transformation of traditional genealogies is only partial. For instance, only about two per cent of the new genealogies I reviewed have comprehensive occupational records. It is also notable that the documentation of women’s information remains less comprehensive compared to men, and female descendants’ offspring are tracked for fewer generations.

Understanding social transformation through genealogies 

Despite the partial nature of the transformation, comparisons of the occupational and educational data from the genealogies and censuses for the Yangtze Valley, where more than 40 percent of the national population resided, suggest that genealogies could broadly represent the wider population. The new generation of genealogies allows us to understand the social structural transformations of China in the 20th century, which witnessed devastating wars, radical political revolutions, and, recently, very rapid economic development that lifted hundreds of millions from dire poverty. 

The Yangtze Valley and the distribution of individuals with occupational records from genealogies the author collected. Drawn by author.

In 1982, 74 percent of China’s labour force was employed in agriculture. By 2020, this figure had dropped to 21 percent, with the majority shifting to manufacturing and services. This is the fastest economic and social structural transformation ever identified in world history.

Genealogical data from the Yangtze Valley highlights several key aspects of this shift.

  • Occupational change over a lifetime: For those born before the 1940s, agriculture was the destination of most people who changed their occupations. But for those born after the 1940s, it became more common for peasants to move into non-agricultural occupations. 
  • Dual occupations: A large number of peasants participated in non-agricultural production, playing significant roles in industries such as construction and the production of building materials and woodwork. 
  • Household labour division: Alongside the more traditional arrangement where the husband works outside the home while the wife manages agricultural production, it has become increasingly common for both partners to leave their home to work in non-agricultural sectors while the elderly remain behind to farm and look after the children. 
  • Intergenerational occupational mobility: The linked genealogical data of the Qian lineage from Lower Yangtze suggest that out of the 448 male peasants born in the 1940s, only 32 (seven percent) of their 499 male descendants continued to work in agriculture, while 467 (93 percent) shifted to non-agricultural sectors. 

The illustration shows occupational mobility between generations, occupational changes over the life time (separated by ‘->’), dual occupations (separated by ‘&’), and gender difference. Drawn by the author based on the genealogy of the Li Lineage in Yunnan province.

Chinese genealogies also contain individual biographies detailing the working experiences of a broad social spectrum. The quantitative and qualitative evidence in these genealogies can finally allow us to understand the working lives of 20th-century China from the perspectives of both macro structures and micro experiences. 

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
And get notified everytime we publish a new blog post.

Further reading

Y. Dai, Lineage genealogies as a new source for researching the occupational structure of twentieth-century China: Tradition (partially) transformed, Historical Methods, XXX.  

What a big family you have, Grandma!

Thursday, August 1st, 2024

Alice Reid & Jim Oeppen

Looking backwards in time gives a mistaken impression that family sizes in the past were larger than they actually were. This blog explains why this happens, and explores the differences between the picture of the past painted by genealogies and the past as it actually was. 

Looking backwards at our families 

Alice’s grandmother, Margaret, had six children, of whom five survived to adulthood. She had 14 grandchildren and (so far) 25 great-grandchildren. She also had two sisters, Kathleen and Moira. Moira had two children, four grandchildren and six great grandchildren. Kathleen remained single and childless throughout her life. On average, the three sisters (Margaret, Kathleen and Moira) had 2.7 children apiece.  

Kathleen, Moira and Margaret with their mother Agnes (also known as Nan) in 1929. Family photograph, courtesy of Colin Reid.

Of the seven offspring in the next generation who survived to adulthood, five of them came from a family of six, and two from a family of two. If you were to gather them all in a room and ask how many children their mothers had (imagine they were not related and therefore did not worry about whether or not siblings should all answer the question), the answer would be 4.9 children The view from the children’s point of view is very different, because there are more of Margaret’s children to remember their big family. The fact that Kathleen had no children means that her family size (of zero) cannot be represented in a calculation of mothers’ family size as reported by children. 

In the next generation the difference is larger still, with the grandchildren’s point of view suggesting that their grandmothers’ generation had 5.2 children on average, nearly double the real number of 2.7. 

Looking back at previous generations of our own families can therefore give an inflated view of how large family sizes were in the past, and can produce distorted impressions of families and family formation. 

Alice’s grandmother Margaret (centre), with her surviving children and her husband. Family photograph, courtesy of Colin Reid.

Family history and genealogy 

Demography takes a “descendant” viewpointThe average family size is calculated from the mother’s viewpoint – the 2.7 children in the example above, not the ascendant 5.2By contrast almost all genealogies are ascendant: i.e. a survivor works backwards, recording the generations in their main line of ascent. (Descendant genealogies select a person in the past and follow their kin forward in time – a future blog will discuss Chinese genealogies, which are usually descendant.)  The extent to which a genealogist follows collateral kin in each generation, such as aunts and uncles etc., is variable – depending on the available records and enthusiasm.   

Campop’s work on reconstructing the demography of English families allows us to calculate the ascendant bias in family size from 1550 to 1850 (i.e. the extent to which ascendant genealogies overstate family sizes). The simple formula that links the averages for the ascendant and descendant views has been known for over a century.  

To simplify the picture, we start by removing the effect of celibacy (women remaining unmarried) and mortality. Assume that every woman married, and both she and her husband survived to at least her 50th birthday. The descendant average number of children over the period varied between about four and six children, but the ascendant view adds 1.5 to two extra children. This is like comparing the average number of children from Margaret and Moira (four) with the average from their children’s point of view (5.2). 

Including women such as Kathleen in the example above, who did not marry or have children increases this bias still further. Celibacy in the past among females surviving to age 50 is thought to have been about 10-15 percent. Adding these women with no descendants to the calculation raises the ascendant bias to about 2.5 children. Similar biases have been found for Basque villages 1800-1969, Brazil 1960-2000, France 1830-1896, the USA 1867-1955, and a variety of late 20th century, high fertility populations.  

Genealogy showing the descendants of Adam and Eve (London, 1611). British Library C.35.l.13.(2).

So, women with descendants, who are more likely to appear in genealogies, are not typical of women in general. Their experience should not be used to characterise the experience of the overall population.

Nevertheless, these women with descendants did exist, and it is also worth considering how they managed to fit larger than average numbers of children into their child-bearing histories. 

The maximum reproductive span for a woman is 35 years (between the ages of 15 and 50). But women in the British past were aged about 25 when they married for the first time (see blog on marriage), and the typical age at last birth in a non-contracepting population of women surviving to age 50 is 41 years, reducing the average fertile period to 26 years.

Tony Wrigley and colleagues at Campop calculated that average inter-birth intervals were 2.5 years: typical of a population with long breast-feeding. Thus, women in an ascendant genealogy would need an extra 6.25 years of reproduction. They must have married young, lived to 50, or had short birth-intervals (or multiple births), or all three. 

Children born to Andrew and Janet Gray, great great grandparents of Agnes (Nan) in the photograph above. Janet’s young age at marriage, survival beyond age 50, and very short birth-intervals enabled her to have 16 singleton births. Image courtesy of Colin Reid.

How do we know? 

This knowledge uses ‘family reconstitution’: the reconstruction of families by linking the baptisms, marriages, and burials recorded in parish registers. This process starts with a marriage and locates the baptisms of bride and groom to establish their birth dates and age at marriage. The births of their children are identified, enabling the age of the mother at birth to be calculated. Finally, the deaths of husband and wife are located in the records, yielding age at death.  

The same process is undertaken for the marriages of each of the children of the original couple, making inter-generational comparisons possible. Campop created a number of family reconstitutions for a variety of communities across England. These have to be treated very carefully to yield accurate demographic measures, but they are our best source of information about the population of England between the mid-16th and mid-19th centuries. 

The bias in ascendant genealogies can be calculated by comparing the average number of children per woman using all women in the population (the descending point of view), with the sibship sizes of those women who had children. In other words, by performing a similar comparison to the example in the first section of this blog.

Further reading 

E. A. Wrigley, R.S. Davies, J.E. Oeppen, and R.S. Schofield, English Population History from Family Reconstitution, 1580–1837 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
And get notified everytime we publish a new blog post.